You stop losing enrollments to “we need to go home and think about it” by clearing one obstacle at a time \u2014 permanence, health, schedule, desire, monthly tuition, then initial tuition \u2014 with every decision maker physically in the room. The objection at the end is almost never the real problem. Compound questions and a missing spouse are.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
On a recent coaching call, a member told me he was having the best enrollment month of his life \u2014 but he still kept running into families who said, “We need to go home and think about it.” He was convinced it was always the money, and he added the line I hear constantly: “I’m not even charging what the other schools on this call charge.” He was under $200 a month, roughly half of where I want a school to be. And he was still<\/em> getting price objections.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Anchor that in, because it’s the single most useful thing in this article. I’ve coached schools at $75 a month with terrible closing ratios who heard “it costs too much” on every conference. I’ve coached schools at $375 a month who close nearly everyone who sits down. Price doesn’t generate the objection. A sloppy, compound, out-of-order enrollment process does.<\/p>\n\n\n\n There are only two objections in this business. Time and money. That’s it. “I don’t have time to come twice a week.” “I don’t want to commit for twelve months.” “I can’t pay that much.” Every stall you will ever hear is one of those two wearing a costume. And the entire purpose of a well-built enrollment process is not to overcome<\/em> objections. It’s to make sure none of them ever get raised in the first place \u2014 because you knocked each one down, in order, before you ever got to the number.<\/p>\n\n\n\n When a smaller school comes to us, we fix things in a specific order. Pricing and enrollment structure first. Stats and ratios second. Only then do we open the floodgates on enrollment volume. Skip the first two and you’re just pouring more traffic into a leaky bucket, and you’ll blame the traffic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Here’s the logic almost nobody outside our world understands. The initial tuition exists to cover the marketing cost of acquiring that student. If it costs you $300 to produce an enrollment from Facebook, Google, or direct mail, and you collect $500 down plus the first month, you’re cash-flow positive on the day they sign. Having worked alongside some of the top direct-response marketers in the world, I can tell you that’s exceedingly rare \u2014 most firms run three or four months negative first. We don’t have to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So the structure I want is straightforward. Monthly tuition for a new student at $347 to $397 \u2014 call it $375 as your working number. An initial tuition presented as “normally $800 to enroll, and because you came in through [source], we’ll take $300 off if you finalize the enrollment today, so it’s $500 plus the first month.” And a 12-month Trial Enrollment \u2014 not month-to-month, and not a “contract” in your language. It’s a trial period, roughly a quarter of the way to black belt, during which the school<\/em> evaluates whether the student is a fit to commit all the way through.<\/p>\n\n\n\n One more rule people fight me on and shouldn’t: the price for the four-year-olds is the same as for the ten-year-olds, which is the same as for the adults. Stop discounting the preschool program.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Now look at what happens when a school charging under $200 goes to $375. Everything else identical \u2014 same students, same effort, same marketing \u2014 and the gross roughly doubles at zero additional cost. That’s the only fix in this business that doubles revenue without a single additional hour of work, which is why we do it first.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Most owners track one number: enrollments. That tells you nothing about where you’re bleeding. You need every step, and you need it broken out by source \u2014 external marketing, internal marketing, Facebook, Google, direct mail, events \u2014 never dumped into one bucket.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The benchmarks I hold people to: face-to-face leads \u2014 a fair, a carnival, a school event \u2014 should convert to appointments at about 90%, because you can book it on the spot. Inbound phone leads should be essentially 100%. Web opt-ins you have to chase run lower, and a 79% lead-to-appointment rate on paid internet traffic is genuinely excellent. That’s why the source split matters \u2014 the same 79% is outstanding from one channel and a failure from another.<\/p>\n\n\n\n First intro to second intro should be close to 100%. If you’re dropping 30% between lesson one and lesson two, you probably tipped your hand on price too early. Second intro to enrollment conference should also<\/em> be close to 100%, and that’s where I see the most catastrophic leak. I recently reviewed a month where nearly half the students who finished their second lesson never got an enrollment conference at all. That’s not a sales problem \u2014 it’s an operations problem: nobody got both parents in, nobody prepped the family, or the staff got distracted and never sat anybody down.<\/p>\n\n\n\n One structural note: we expanded the introductory process from two lessons to four for exactly this reason. With a two-lesson intro, if Dad can’t come until next week, you either run the conference without him or push everything out a week and it dies on the vine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n One of my early mentors in this business described the enrollment conference as walking through a room with seven or eight doors, closing and locking each one behind you as you go. I’ve never found a better picture of it. If you leave a door open, the family walks back out through it \u2014 and when they do, they call it “we want to think it over.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n So here’s the sequence I’ve taught for four decades, and that our team drills with staff until it’s automatic. I call it the Locked Door Sequence. Six doors, one precondition, and one recovery move.<\/p>\n\n\n\n One of our coaches, Dr. Greg Moody, has his staff print this list, laminate it, and tape it to the back of the clipboard the file sits on. That’s not a joke \u2014 that’s exactly the right level of discipline. Nobody improvises this.<\/p>\n\n\n\n You will never get out of “I need to go home and think about it” if the person they need to talk to is at home. Ever. So this isn’t a preference, it’s a rule with no exceptions: both parents, or both guardians, or the grandparent who’s paying \u2014 everyone who can say no must be sitting there.<\/p>\n\n\n\n When a member tells me his families are single-income and the working spouse can’t come at 3 o’clock, my answer is simple: then don’t schedule the intro at 3 o’clock. Schedule it at 6:30. Practically speaking, Mom often brings the child the first time no matter what you do \u2014 fine. Then you schedule lesson two and the conference for a time when both can be there, and you use your four-lesson intro to absorb the delay.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Divorced families are more<\/em> important, not less. The worst thing you can construct is Mom taking a price sheet home and asking her ex to chip in on half \u2014 worst possible message, worst possible messenger. And when a mother says the father won’t have anything to do with it, she’s usually wrong: if he has any custody at all, he has to bring the child on his days and be enthusiastic about it, or you’ve built “not invented here” resistance into the family. I’ve run an enrollment conference walking back and forth between two offices because the parents wouldn’t sit together. Do that before you run one with half the decision makers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n When someone is genuinely unreachable \u2014 deployed overseas, out of state \u2014 get them on Zoom or FaceTime for the class and<\/em> the conference. I’ve done conferences with a father overseas on a satellite phone and a grandparent patched in from another time zone. If even that’s impossible, drip on them hard beforehand: the introductory packet, short video clips, and a phone video of their own child taking that first lesson. What you cannot do is let one parent carry the pitch home secondhand. A member described leaving a mother alone for two minutes to call her deployed husband and returning to find her in tears because he’d said no \u2014 of course he did. He hadn’t seen anything.<\/p>\n\n\n\n “As we talked about, you two are pretty permanent in the area \u2014 no likelihood of moving or transferring, so there’s no worry about Joey being able to follow through with this?”<\/p>\n\n\n\n Simple, and it does two things. It confirms a fact you should already know from the introductory process, and it frames the program as something with a multi-year horizon. You’re not selling a month. You’re selling the road to black belt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n “And we talked about Joey’s asthma \u2014 this is actually going to be very good for that. Other than that, no health issues or injuries we should know about?”<\/p>\n\n\n\n Notice I’m not asking a new question \u2014 I’m confirming something already surfaced during the intro, and reframing the condition as a reason to train rather than hesitate. Every door should be a confirmation, not a discovery. If you’re discovering things in the enrollment conference, your intro process is too thin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n “And Monday at 6:15 and Thursday at 7:00 works fine for the schedule?”<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is the door people most often leave cracked. You’ll get: “Well, we’d like Monday and Thursday, but we haven’t gotten the soccer schedule yet.” Don’t argue and don’t panic. Reframe from fixed times to total volume: “Really, what we need is to average about 16 classes every couple of months. If he ends up with soccer practice on one of those nights, you can use any of the other class times either as your permanent class or as a makeup. Sometimes that’s one class one week and three the next. So regardless of soccer, you’re comfortable with him being here twice a week?” Then lock it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Which is also an argument about schedule design. If your only beginner classes are Tuesday and Thursday, you’ve guaranteed a chunk of every month’s prospects can’t enroll. Flexibility on the schedule board is a sales tool.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Before you ever say a number, you confirm they want the outcome. This is where I sketch the path \u2014 a blank sheet of paper, one arrow to first-degree black belt, another to second degree \u2014 and I talk to the child as much as the parents. “Joey’s seven now, so he’s likely to earn his black belt around ten or eleven. And from there, Joey, you could be a second-degree black belt before you’re even in high school. A lot of the kids who get that far end up teaching through high school and college \u2014 that’s exactly what I did.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n Then to the parents: “Wouldn’t that be a great way to help him develop leadership skills and have something real on a college r\u00e9sum\u00e9?” I’ve had students go on to every kind of school you can name, in part because of the leadership and teaching credentials they built on our mat, not just the belt. If the parent’s hot button is confidence, focus, discipline, or bully-proofing, aim there instead. But you must have an explicit yes on “this is something we want” before money enters the conversation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n “I don’t remember whether we talked about the monthly tuition already or not \u2014 it’s going to be in the range of $347 to $397 a month. Is that going to work okay for the budget?”<\/p>\n\n\n\n Then stop. Put the pencil down. Relax your shoulders. And genuinely wait. What I actually want<\/em> here is for one of them to choke on it a little \u2014 Dad looks at Mom, Mom looks at Dad, one of them taps the kid on the head and says, “Are you going to be serious about this?” The kid says, “Yes sir.” Dad says, “Well, if he’s going to be serious about it, we can do it.” That’s the door locking.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If instead you get hesitation, treat it as a budget conversation and nothing else: “Let’s talk about that. Obviously you’ve got to be able to pay the rent, put gas in the car, and feed Billy \u2014 my students don’t do well when they’re not eating. Is that something you can work into the budget?” That line does a lot of quiet work. It signals you’re on their side, it takes the pressure off, and with the more affluent prospect who’s really just negotiating out of habit \u2014 the one who pulls up in a Porsche and asks “isn’t that a lot for karate lessons?” \u2014 reframing it as a budget question hits their ego, and they’ll tell you of course they can afford it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Critically: if you don’t get a yes here, there is no reason on earth to move to Door Six. Don’t mention the initial tuition. Don’t mention the twelve months. Don’t mention the discount. Every additional number you introduce while an earlier door is still open makes the situation worse, not better.<\/p>\n\n\n\n “So \u2014 he wants to be a black belt, and we’re starting with a Trial Enrollment, which is about a quarter of the way there. Normally it’s $800 to enroll; because you came in through our school program, we’ll knock $300 off if you finalize today, so it’s $500 plus the first month. How would you like to take care of that?”<\/p>\n\n\n\n If every prior door is locked, this is the only remaining place a real objection can live \u2014 and in my experience it’s where it usually is. The answer is almost always about timing, not value: “We were planning on the first month, we just didn’t know we’d be paying $800-something today.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n You don’t flinch and you don’t discount further. “Okay \u2014 will that work?” “Things are tight until I get paid next week.” “You’re welcome to put it on a credit card if that helps.” “We just have a debit card.” “Okay \u2014 what would work?” “We can do the first month.” “No problem, let’s do that and get Joey started.” Run the card, start the paperwork, and then<\/em> ask: “So the $500 will be fine on the first?” If they push it to next month, say no problem. You just closed the enrollment. The price never moved. Only the calendar did.<\/p>\n\n\n\n And when the twelve months surfaces \u2014 sometimes it doesn’t come up until the pen is on the agreement \u2014 you go straight back to the language you already used: “Right, as I explained, it’s about four years to black belt. We’re starting with about a quarter of that, which is the twelve months, and that’s on a trial basis until we decide together whether we’re ready to commit to taking Joey all the way.” Same words. No new frame. No defensiveness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sometimes, despite everything, you get “we want to go home and think about it.” I learned the answer to this decades ago from Tom Hopkins’ How to Master the Art of Selling<\/em> \u2014 full credit where it’s due; I once had my entire staff memorize the relevant chapter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Step one: agree with them. “I understand \u2014 you want to make sure this is the best decision for your family.” Why agree? Because it releases the pressure. They’re braced for a salesperson to push back, and you didn’t.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Step two \u2014 and this is where most people get it wrong \u2014 do not<\/em> ask “what specifically do you want to think over?” You’ll get “oh, everything, we just want to look it all over,” and now you have nothing. Instead say: “Just to clarify my thinking…” and start back at Door One. “As we talked about, you’re permanent in the area, so no concern there? Right. And no health issues other than the asthma? Right. And Monday and Thursday work for the schedule?”<\/p>\n\n\n\n You will get stuck somewhere. That’s the point. The place you get stuck is the actual objection \u2014 the one they were never going to tell you directly. Sometimes it’s stunningly specific and completely solvable: “My company just got bought and I’m worried my job goes away by December.” I can handle that. I can build in an option. But until they tell me, I have no way to solve anything. The whole process is excavation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n And once you solve the thing you got stuck on, don’t assume everything downstream is fine. Go back through the rest of the doors anyway.<\/p>\n\n\n\n On that call, one member described exactly the failure I see most often. He’d say something like: “To get started in our program it’s an initial of $800 and then $347 a month, but because you came in on the intro special…” \u2014 all in one breath.<\/p>\n\n\n\n That’s two decisions presented simultaneously, sometimes three if you throw in the term length. And when a family is asked to evaluate a compound decision, they don’t pick one. They reject the whole package with a vague stall, because that’s the only response available to them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Then, when he asked how to handle “we can’t afford either the down payment or the monthly,” I told him he was already down a rat hole. You can’t solve two problems at once, and you shouldn’t have to, because they should never have been on the table at the same time. One thing at a time. Get a clean yes on the monthly. Then and only then present the initial. Never, ever create a situation where the family is simultaneously weighing the schedule, an upcoming medical bill, a possible layoff, the monthly, and the down payment. That’s not a decision \u2014 that’s an anxiety attack, and the exit from an anxiety attack is “let us think about it.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n Grandmaster Jeff Smith put it bluntly on that call and he’s right: when they say they’re going to go home and discuss it with their spouse, they never actually do. And on the rare occasion they do, they do it badly \u2014 a two-minute conversation in the kitchen with none of the context, none of the mat chat, none of the child’s face lighting up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n They never check their finances. They never run the numbers. They never open the budget spreadsheet. Here’s the trap I had to warn every new program director about: eventually one family will go home, think about it, and come back and enroll \u2014 and that director will conclude letting people leave is a viable strategy. I’d sit them down and say congratulations, that’s your one out of a hundred. The next ninety-nine aren’t coming back. Don’t let an anomaly install a habit that will cost you a career.<\/p>\n\n\n\n When an objection does come, the mechanics are simple and almost nobody executes them. Hear them out completely. Paraphrase it back. Then answer it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Martial artists are terrible listeners, and young black belt staff are the worst of all. When the parent is talking, they’re rehearsing their next line. I watch instructors answer objections that were never raised \u2014 they heard three words, pattern-matched to a script, and started talking, while the real concern went unaddressed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Paraphrasing does two jobs: it confirms you understood, and it proves you listened, which by itself defuses most of the tension in the room. Listen a couple of layers deep, too \u2014 people frequently ask a question that isn’t the thing they actually want answered, and answering the surface version marches you down a rabbit hole that never needed exploring.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A member asked me the sharpest question on the call: at what point do you complete the hip throw? Where’s the sentence where you turn it around and say “no, you’re not going home to think about it”?<\/p>\n\n\n\n There isn’t one. This is soft style. There is no moment where you push, because the instant you look pushy rather than guiding, they resist. The worst sales posture in existence is selling hungry \u2014 needing the enrollment. My posture was always the opposite: we have plenty of students, we’re the top school in the state, and that’s true whether you enroll or not. What I’m doing is making sure nothing is standing between what you told me you want and the path you’re on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Occasionally someone says, “Why are you pressuring me?” Dr. Greg Moody made an excellent point on that: don’t take it personally and don’t retreat. When you’re calmly walking someone through six confirmations, there’s no pressure in the room. Their nervousness about making a decision is what’s talking. That’s a signal to keep helping them decide, not to back away \u2014 because walking through the list is exactly what calms them down enough to say yes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Everybody wants a presentation sheet with a value assigned to every component \u2014 uniform, gear, seminars, testing fees \u2014 all itemized to justify the number. I don’t use it. The second you itemize, you invite them to price-shop the pieces, and the pieces are always cheaper somewhere. Keep it to: you’re coming twice a week, your objective is black belt, we’re starting with a Trial Enrollment about a quarter of the way there, the monthly is in this range, the initial is this. Done.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Everything the white belt needs, just include it. And here’s the tactical beauty of that: after the enrollment is finalized, you say, “Oh, by the way, Billy’s going to need this and this and this \u2014 here you go.” They ask what it costs. You say it’s included. That builds reciprocity, which is worth far more than the same items listed as line items on a sheet they were evaluating against your price.<\/p>\n\n\n\n And notice the ratio of talking. In the enrollment conference I say very little. I ask, I listen, I confirm, I move to the next door. All of the selling and all of the explaining happened out on the floor, during the introductory lessons, before anyone sat down. If you’re doing heavy persuasion in the office, your intro process failed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n There’s a hard line between two very different responses. A working family holding down extra hours, telling you honestly they need to figure out how to fit it into the budget \u2014 while making clear this is worth ten times what you’re charging \u2014 I can work with all day long. That’s a logistics problem, and logistics problems have solutions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But if someone tells you “that’s a lot of money for karate lessons,” you have a value problem, not a price problem. Something in your introductory process didn’t land. They didn’t see the mat chats, didn’t see the character development materials, didn’t see the confidence lessons, didn’t watch their own child memorize the student creed and stand up straighter. If that regularly happens in your school, fix the intro \u2014 don’t lower the price.<\/p>\n\n\n\n And I have heard every version of “you don’t understand my market.” Too rich. Too poor. Too small. Too rural. Twenty-two competitors within two miles. I’ve heard “our clientele are too sophisticated to pay that” from owners in the wealthiest zip codes in America and “nobody here has money” from owners in farm country \u2014 and I’ve watched schools in both settings charge premium tuition and thrive. When I opened in Denver I counted 386 martial arts schools in the metro area, priced at double the next highest school, and within 24 months had roughly half the martial arts students in the market. Your competition is not your constraint.<\/p>\n\n\n\n None of this matters if nobody walks in the door. Failing schools always ask the same question on the way in: “What’s the one thing that’s working right now?” They want a magic pill. There isn’t one \u2014 there’s a list, and it’s nearly endless.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The standard is 15 to 20 promotional activities running every month, split across internal and external marketing, five or six in each category. Planning a big November fundraiser? Wonderful \u2014 you still have to fill October. And every buddy event, pizza party, and fundraiser requires a permission slip capturing contact information for every guest, plus rewards for the students who bring them. I give a stripe for bringing a friend and a bonus stripe if that friend enrolls \u2014 because a student with friends in the program doesn’t quit. The dropout is the isolated kid who never got connected.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The other half is your calendar. Nobody ever misses their 7 o’clock class, but almost nobody blocks time for marketing, so it gets eaten by texts, notifications, and other people’s urgencies. Start every day with a blank legal pad and the phone off: what am I doing today, this week, this month to market the school? If you truly can’t think of anything, take a right out the door and knock \u2014 preferably on doors that hold 50 or 500 prospects at once: elementary schools, daycares, employers, high-traffic businesses. When revenue is low, effort has to be extremely high. Massive action, five days a week, beats one clever idea every time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The real answer is that you should never have created the situation. Every decision maker must be present for the enrollment conference \u2014 no exceptions for divorced, deployed, or working parents. If it’s already happened, agree with them, then say “just to clarify my thinking” and walk back through permanence, health, schedule, desire, and monthly tuition until you find the door that’s still open. That’s the actual objection.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Never. That’s a compound decision, and families reject compound decisions with a vague stall. Get an explicit yes on the monthly range first \u2014 “$347 to $397 a month, will that work for the budget?” \u2014 and only after that yes do you present the initial tuition and the discount for finalizing today. One thing at a time, always.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Because price isn’t what produces the objection \u2014 process is. I’ve coached schools at $75 a month with terrible closing ratios. If families regularly tell you it’s “a lot for karate lessons,” your introductory process isn’t building enough value, and lowering the price will make that worse, not better. Fix the intro and the enrollment sequence, then raise tuition to the $347\u2013$397 range.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If your enrollment conferences are still improvised \u2014 if you’re presenting compound decisions, sitting down with one parent, or defending your price instead of locking doors \u2014 book a Free Consultation and Personal Evaluation<\/a> (a $1,297 value) with my coaching team through the Sales<\/a> hub. We’ll walk your actual numbers, ratio by ratio, and rebuild your enrollment conference into the Locked Door Sequence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n And if the deeper problem is that not enough families are sitting across the desk from you in the first place, grab my free book Six Simple Steps to Add 100 Students<\/em> at FillYourSchool.com<\/a> \u2014 it’s the front end of everything described here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This sequence only holds up when it’s built on premium tuition and a 12-month Trial Enrollment structure, which is exactly what I cover in my Pricing<\/a> training. And the twenty-activities-a-month engine that feeds it is the core of my Marketing<\/a> training.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n In your free growth diagnostic, Stephen Oliver and Jeff Smith will identify the biggest obstacle between your school or gym and its next revenue level \u2014 and map the most direct path forward. A $1,297 value, at no charge and no obligation.<\/p>\n Call to Schedule: +1 (720) 256-0208<\/a>Schedule Online \u2192<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n Stephen Oliver, MBA and 10th Degree Black Belt, is the Founder and CEO of Mile High Karate and Martial Arts Wealth Mastery, CEO of NAPMA (National Association of Professional Martial Artists), and Publisher of Martial Arts Professional magazine. A martial arts school owner since 1975, he and his coaching team \u2014 including Grandmaster Jeff Smith and Dr. Greg Moody \u2014 have helped school owners across the world build $1M+ schools.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nTwo Things You Must Fix Before the Enrollment Conference Will Ever Work<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Fix One: Price So the Enrollment Pays for Itself on Day One<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Fix Two: Track Every Ratio, Not Just the Bucket<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
The Locked Door Sequence<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
The Precondition: Every Decision Maker in the Room<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Door One: Permanence<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Door Two: Health<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Door Three: Schedule<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Door Four: Desire and Commitment<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Door Five: The Monthly Tuition<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Door Six: The Initial Tuition<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
The Recovery Move: “Just to Clarify My Thinking”<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
The Compound Decision Mistake That Kills More Enrollments Than Price<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
They Never Actually Go Home and Think About It<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Hear, Paraphrase, Answer \u2014 and Actually Listen<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Soft Style, Not Hard Style<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Stop Building Presentation Sheets<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
If They Say “That’s a Lot for Karate Lessons,” You Failed on Value<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Twenty Things Going Every Single Month<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
What do I say when a parent says they need to talk to their spouse at home?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Should I present the monthly tuition and the down payment together?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
I charge much less than $375 and I still get price objections. Why?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Your Next Step<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Your School Should Not Depend on You Doing Everything<\/h3>\n
About the Author<\/h2>\n\n\n\n